Apparatus and method for testing mechanical endurance of a surface of an optical disc

ABSTRACT

An apparatus and method for testing mechanical endurance of a surface of an optical disc are disclosed. The apparatus includes a rotating plate, on which an optical disc to be scratched is loaded, for rotating the loaded optical disc, and a plurality of abrasion wheels of a predetermined type, disposed at a perpendicular to the rotating plate, for contacting the optical disc and generating the scratch, the scratch being generated when the optical disc rotates a predetermined number of turns, e.g., maximum of 5 turns for the abrasion wheels to apply a predetermined load on the optical disc.

This application claims the benefit of the Korean Application No.P2003-16513 filed on Mar. 17,. 2003, which is hereby incorporated byreference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for testingquality of an optical, disc, and more particularly, to an apparatusmethod for testing quality of mechanical endurance of a surface of anoptical disc.

2. Discussion of the Related Art

Up to now, there are recording media such as a magnetic recording tape,a laser disc (LD) or a compact disc (CD) as an optical disc, and adigital video disc (DVD) newly born with a vast recording capacity.

Since the optical disc among the recording media utilizes a digitalrecording system different from the conventional recording system, thatis, magnetic recording system, and has a very small volume and weight sothat it is efficient and convenient to keep and carry, it is a recenttrend for a consumer to prefer the optical disc.

However, even any appliance should be used without any defect, and ifthere were any problem in quality, then the consumer's reliability forthe manufacturer would be decreased.

This causes more serious problem in the optical disc having minutesignal characteristics and brings inferior quality originated from theerror of thickness of a disc, scratch, deformity, fingerprint, andattachment of foreign material during manufacturing of the product.

Thus, a produced optical disc undergoes the quality test as a nextprocess, and the optical disc is shipped to an optical disc market.

A conventional quality test for an optical disc is generally performedby four measuring drives.

First, under the assumption that characteristics of optical discsmanufactured by the same equipment are identical, the manufacturer makesa choice of an arbitrary optical disc from all of the manufacturedoptical discs and loads the selected optical disc onto a measuringsystem.

In the first measuring drive, a high frequency wave signal and a jitterare measured by means of a signal-reproduced from the optical disc.

In the second measuring drive, a servo signal (a focusing error signaland a tracking error signal) are measured based on a signal reproducedfrom the optical disc.

In the third measuring drive, the mechanical characteristics of theoptical disc, which undergoes the quality test, are measured.

Finally, in the fourth measuring drive, the optical characteristics ofthe optical disc are measured.

As described above, according to the conventional test, an accuracy ofinformation recording, and the mechanical characteristics and an opticalcharacteristics of the optical disc are inspected.

From these, since a mechanical damage that would occur on an incidentsurface of an information recording/reproducing laser beam during theuse of an high density optical disc, that is, a scratch and the likecauses the deterioration of a signal of an optical disc as well as dataloss, and in more worse case, brings the recording and/or reproducing ofinformation onto the optical disc impossible, the damage takes the mostimportant portion of the quality test of the optical disc.

Therefor, to prevent this, a protective coating may be formed to enhancethe mechanical stiffness or hardness of the surface of the optical disc.

However, after forming the protective coating on the disc surface forthis purpose, the mechanical characteristics of the protective coatingshould be quantized. Namely, there is need to quantize for how long theprotective coating endure the scratch which would occur during the useof the optical disc.

There are a pencil hardness test and a taber abrasion test as a test forthe quantization of surface-proof of the high-density optical disc.

The pencil hardness test is an estimating method for estimating thescratch at a hardness value corresponding a hardness of the pencil at aninstant when the scratch occurs by contacting pencils of which differenthardness to the optical disc in a rectilinear motion.

However, the pencil hardness test is a test for generating the scratchby which a human contacts the pencil on the surface of the optical disc,has disadvantages that it is difficult not only to maintain same loadcontinuously, but also to generate the quantization scratch because thescratch does not occur as many as desired.

The taber abrasion test is a test to estimate degree of endurance byuniformly wearing the surface of the optical disc while giving apredetermined load by means of D1004 method of a standard, AmericanSociety for Testing and Materials (ASTM) as a kind of an abrasion wheel.

In the conventional taber abrasion testing apparatus, if an optical discto be scratched is loaded and rotated, a plurality of abrasion wheelshaving a predetermined weight contact the optical disc at aperpendicular position to the optical disc so that scratch the surfaceof the optical disc by a uniform load for at least more ten rotation ofthe optical disc.

At that time, the ASTM defines the load generated from the abrasionwheel less than 9.8N (1000 gf), and there are several kinds such asCS-10F, CS-10, and CS-17 to be used.

The taber abrasion testing apparatus as described above is an equipmentdesigned for the purpose of not testing the mechanical endurance of thesurface of the optical disc by scratching the optical disc, but testinga degree of the scratch of general plastic goods.

Therefore, the scratch occurring by the taber abrasion testing apparatusis remarkably different, from the scratch generated when the opticaldisc is used actually in real life.

Namely, the taber abrasion testing apparatus determines the endurance ofthe surface of the optical disc by wearing the surface. This isremarkably different from the situation that real-generated scratch isreacted in a drive (for example, an optical disc drive) for driving theoptical disc by responding the operation.

Therefore, since the manufacturer determines the quality of the opticaldisc by his relative determination with his veteran know-how notquantitative classification according to an actual reference standardwhen to determine the quality of the optical disc poor or good by thetaber abrasion testing apparatus, there are a plenty of errors.Moreover, since the scratches generated on the optical disc in real lifeand by the taber abrasion testing apparatus are different from eachother in the shape, a try to determine the optical disc poor or goodwith only the know-how without absolute reference value makes vast oferrors.

As described above, since, up to now, there is not a special method forquantizing generation degree of the scratch in order to test themechanical endurance of the surface of the optical disc, a quantizationof the degree of the scratch is urgently demanded.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention is directed to an apparatus andmethod for testing mechanical endurance of a surface of an optical discthat substantially obviates one or more problems due to limitations anddisadvantages of the related art.

An object of the present invention is to provide an optimum apparatusfor testing to quantize characteristics of mechanical endurance of asurface of an optical disc for the purpose of enhancing mechanicalcharacteristics of the surface and a method performed by the apparatus.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus fortesting mechanical endurance of a surface of an optical disc, increasingreliability, and saving the testing cost, and a method performed by theapparatus.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatusfor classifying a poor product and a good product by setting an absolutereference rapidly and precisely, and a method performed by theapparatus.

Still another object of the present invention is to generate scratch ofthe closest type of the scratch to be generated in real life so as toenhance the reliability of the test for the mechanical endurance of asurface of an optical disc.

Additional advantages, objects, and features of the invention will beset forth in part in the description which follows and in part willbecome apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art uponexamination of the following or may be learned from practice of theinvention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention may berealized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in thewritten description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.

To achieve these objects and other advantages and in accordance with thepurpose of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, anapparatus for testing mechanical endurance of a surface of an opticaldisc, includes a rotating plate, on which an optical disc to bescratched is loaded, for rotating the loaded optical disc, and aplurality of abrasion wheels, disposed at a perpendicular to therotating plate, for contacting the optical disc and generating thescratch, the scratch being generated when the optical disc rotates under5 turns for the abrasion wheels apply a predetermined load on theoptical disc.

In another aspect of the present invention, the load applied on theoptical disc by the abrasion wheels ranged from 0.5N (50 gf) to 16.2N(1650 gf) and the depth of the scratch on the surface of the opticaldisc ranges 0 μm to 2 μm.

The abrasion wheel may be selected any one of CS-10F, CS-10, and CS-17.

The scratch may be generated when the optical disc rotates one turn forthe optical disc is applied with a load of 0.5N to 2.5N (50 gf to 250gf) by the CS-10F abrasion wheel, when the optical disc rotates one turnfor the optical disc is applied with a load of 6.4N to 8.3N (650 gf to850 gf) by the CS-10 abrasion wheel, and when the optical disc rotatesone turn for the optical disc is applied with a load of 11.8N to 13.7N(1209 gf to 1400 gf) by the CS-17 abrasion wheel.

In still another aspect of the present invention, a method of testing amechanical endurance of a surface of an optical disc by using an testapparatus of which a rotating plate rotates the optical disc and aplurality of abrasion wheels generates scratch on the optical disc,includes the steps of fixing the optical disc on the rotating plate,rotating the optical disc by the rotating plate, contacting the abrasionwheels to the surface of the optical disc and increasing a contactingload of the abrasion wheels and the optical disc by a predeterminedload, generating the scratch on the surface of the optical disc bymaintaining the contacting load of the optical disc and the abrasionwheels until the optical disc rotates bellow five turns and departingthe abrasion wheels contacting the optical disc from the optical disc,and separating the optical disc from the rotating plate and determiningwhether the optical disc is poor or good by comparing a depth of thescratch generated on the surface of the optical disc with apredetermined absolute reference value.

According an aspect of the present invention, the optical discdetermining step determines that the optical disc is good when the depthof the scratch generated on the surface of the optical disc is equal toor greater than 0 μm or less than 2 μm, and that the optical disc ispoor when the depth of the scratch generated on the surface of theoptical disc is greater than 2 μm.

The absolute reference value for determining the optical disc poor orgood is set to 2 μm.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description andthe following detailed description of the present invention areexemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide furtherexplanation of the invention as claimed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a furtherunderstanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute apart of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention andtogether with the description serve to explain the principle of theinvention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic view showing a taber abrasion testingapparatus according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart showing a method of testing mechanicalendurance of a surface of an optical disc according to the presentinvention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a view explaining a predetermined scratch pattern isgenerated on an optical disc by using a micro-scratch tester accordingto the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a graph showing experimental values of scratch depthgenerated according to pressure applied on an optical disc according tothe present invention; and

FIG. 5 illustrates a graph explaining a method of testing mechanicalendurance of a surface of an optical disc according to the presentinvention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of thepresent invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanyingdrawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be usedthroughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.

FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic view showing a taber abrasion testingapparatus according to the present invention.

As illustrated in FIG. 1, an apparatus for testing mechanical enduranceof a surface of an optical disc includes a rotating plate 20, on whichan optical disc 30 to be scratched is loaded, for rotating the loadedoptical disc 30, and a plurality of abrasion wheels 10, disposed at aperpendicular to the rotating plate 20, for contacting the optical disc30 and generating the scratch, the scratch being generated when theoptical disc 30 rotates under 5 turns for the abrasion wheels 10 apply apredetermined load on the optical disc 30.

Meanwhile, the abrasion wheels are selected from any one of CS-10F,CS-10, and CS-17.

Hereinafter, the testing method of the mechanical endurance of thesurface of the optical disc of the present invention by reference withthe accompanying drawings.

FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart showing a method of testing mechanicalendurance of a surface of an optical disc according to the presentinvention.

As shown in FIG. 2, first, the optical disc 30 is fixed on the rotatingplate 20, and then the rotating plate 20 rotates together the opticaldisc (Step S10).

Next, the abrasion wheels 10 contact the optical disc 30 being rotatedat an upper end in a normal motion (Step S20).

The predetermined load is applied on the optical disc 30 in normaldirection according to the scratch test so that the contacting loadbetween the optical disc 30 and the abrasion wheels 10 is increased(Step S30).

After maintaining the contacting load between the optical disc 30 andthe abrasion wheels 10 as many as the predetermined turns of the opticaldisc 30, the abrasion wheels. 10 are moved in the normal direction sothat the abrasion wheels are departed from the optical disc 30 (StepS40).

As described above, on the surface of the optical disc 30 being rotated,the predetermined load and the abrasion wheels 10 contacting the opticaldisc 30 based on the predetermined turns cause the generation of apredetermined scratch pattern on the surface of the optical disc 30 asillustrated in FIG. 3.

As illustrated in FIG. 3, by using the taber abrasion tester accordingto the present invention, the predetermined scratch pattern is generatedon the surface of the optical disc 30, so that the depth of the scratchcan be obtained.

FIG. 4 illustrates a graph showing experimental values of the scratchdepth generated according to pressure applied on the optical disc 30according to the present invention. Here, a bare disc without a coatinglayer and a hard-coated disc are used as experimental materials.

In the experiment as illustrated in FIG. 4, if the scratch with depthdeeper than 2 μm is generated, it is measure that a servo error isgenerated when a dynamic characteristics of the optical disc 30 isestimated.

Namely, when the endurance test of the surface of the optical disc 30 isperformed, the 2 μm is defined as the absolute reference value fordetermining whether the optical disc 30 is poor or good, and by findinga still wool test condition causing the scratch depth of 2 μm, themechanical endurance of the surface of the optical disc 30 under thecondition so that the generation degree of the scratch is quantized.

FIG. 5 is a graph explaining a method of testing mechanical endurance ofa surface of an optical disc according to the present invention, andrepresents a graph as the depth of the scratch generated on the opticaldisc 30 by the load applied to kind of abrasion wheel such as CS-10F,CS-10, and CS-17.

As illustrated in FIG. 5, the load generated from the abrasion wheels 10is quantized to 0.5N (50 gf) to 16.2N (1650 gf), and is differently setaccording to kind of the abrasion wheels.

Namely, in the taber abrasion test, under the condition of using theCS-10F as the abrasion wheel 10 and rotating the optical disc 30 onlyone turn, it is understood that the load generating the scratch depth of2 μm ranges 0.5N (50 gf) to 2.5N (250 gf), preferably 1.5N (150 gf).

Under the condition of using the CS-10 as the abrasion wheel 10 androtating the optical disc 30 only one turn, it is understood that theload generating the scratch depth of 2 μm ranges 6.4N (650 gf) to 8.3N(850 gf), more preferably 7.4N (750 gf).

Moreover, under the condition of using the CS-17 as the abrasion wheel10 and rotating the optical disc 30 only one turn, it is understood thatthe load generating the scratch depth of 2 μm ranges 11.8N (1200 gf) to13.7N (1400 gf), more preferably 13.2N (1350 gf).

Therefore, if the abrasion wheel 10 were hard one, namely, CS-10F, theload of the surface of the optical disc 30 is quantized to 0.5N (50 gf)to 2.5N (250 gf), more preferably quantized to 1.5N (150 gf), if theabrasion wheel 10 were middle one, namely, CS-10, the load of thesurface of the optical disc 30 is quntized to 6.4N (650 gf) to 8.3N (850gf), more preferably quantized to 7.4N (750 gf), and if the abrasionwheel 10 were soft one, namely, CS-17, the load of the surface of theoptical disc 30 is quntized to 11.8N (1200 gf) to 13.7N (1400 gf), morepreferably quantized to 13.2N (1350 gf).

The contacting load between the optical disc 30 and the abrasion wheel10 is maintained to a corresponding load in proportion to numbers of theturn of the optical disc according to quantized condition so that thescratch is generated on the optical disc 30.

At that time, by reducing the abrasion degree of the optical disc 30 dueto the abrasion wheel 10 at minimum by decreasing the number of the turnof the optical disc 30 to under 5 turns, the scratch very closer to thescratch to be generated in an actual life so that the reliability oftest for the mechanical endurance of the surface of the optical disc 30can be enhanced.

In other words, the scratch on the optical disc 20 in the real life isgenerated by being scratched few times, on the contrary, the more timesthe abrasion wheels 10 are scratched, the more the scratch duringseveral rotation of the optical disc 30 by using the taber abrasiontester makes a difference from the scratch in real life due to abrasionof ambient optical disc to be scratched.

With this reason, there is a problem in the reliability for themechanical endurance test of the surface of the optical disc due to thescratch, and then this is the worst serious problem occurring in themechanical endurance test of the surface of the optical disc accordingto the conventional art.

According to the present invention, since the number of turns of theoptical disc can be reduced to 1 turn at minimum to 5 turns at maximumvalue by the quantized-absolute reference value, the reliability of themechanical endurance test of the surface of the optical disc can beenhanced by causing the scratch of type the closest the scratch in reallife.

As described above, just during one turn of the optical disc, aftergenerating the scratch by using the load condition 0.5N (50 gf) to 16.2N(1650 gf) causing the scratch with a depth of 2 μm, the endurance is tobe tested through the scratch generated on the surface of the opticaldisc 30 by separating the scratched disc 30 from the rotating plate 20.Next, the optical disc 30 is determined to be poor or good (Step S50).

After this, other optical disc to be tested is loaded on the rotatingplate 20, the testing operations as described above are repeated so thata plenty of optical discs are determined to be poor or good.

As described above, the apparatus for testing the mechanical enduranceof the surface of the optical disc and the method performed theapparatus have following advantages.

First, the generation degree of the scratch is quantized to enhance themechanical characteristics of the surface so that the preservation ofdata according to achievement for the high-density of the optical disccan be increased.

Second, since the quality of the optical disc is tested easily andprecisely, the reliability of the optical disc can be enhanced.

Third, the scratch can be formed as much as to wish in a short time sothat the testing time for the mechanical endurance test of the surfaceof the optical disc can be also decreased and the manufacturing cost maybe reduced.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that variousmodifications *and variations can be made in the present invention.Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers the modificationsand variations of this invention provided they come within the scope ofthe appended claims and their equivalents.

1. An apparatus for testing a scratch endurance of a surface of anoptical disc, comprising: a rotating plate for rotating the loadedoptical disc; and a plurality of abrasion wheels, for contacting theoptical disc and generating a scratch, the scratch being generatedduring the optical disc rotates up to 5 turns while the abrasion wheelsapply a predetermined load on the rotated optical discs, wherein theapparatus determines whether the optical disc has a predeterminedendurance by comparing a result from the scratch generated on thesurface of the optical disc with a predetermined reference value.
 2. Theapparatus of claim 1, wherein the load applied on the optical disc bythe abrasion wheels ranged from 0.5N (50 gf) to 16.2N (1650 gf).
 3. Theapparatus of claim 1, wherein a depth of the scratch on the surface ofthe optical disc ranges 0 μm to 2 μm if the optical disc has thepredetermined endurance.
 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein theabrasion wheel is any one of CS-10F, CS-10, and CS-17.
 5. The apparatusof claim 1, wherein the scratch is generated when the rotated opticaldisc rotates is applied with a load of 0.5N to 2.5N (50 gf to 250 gf) bythe CS-10F abrasion wheel.
 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein thescratch is generated when the rotated optical disc is applied with aload of 6.4 N to 8.3N (650 gf to 850 gf) by the CS-10 abrasion wheel. 7.The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the scratch is generated when therotated optical disc is applied with a load of 11.8N to 13.7N (1200 gfto 1400 gf) by the CS-17 abrasion wheel.
 8. A method of testing ascratch endurance of a surface of an optical disc by using a testingapparatus of which a rotating plate rotates the optical disc and aplurality of abrasion wheels generates scratch on the optical disc,comprising the steps of: contacting the abrasion wheels with apredetermined load to the surface of the optical disc; and maintainingthe contact of the surface of the optical disc and the abrasion wheelsduring the optical disc rotates up to five turns to generate a scratchon the surface of the optical disc; and determining whether the opticaldisc has a predetermined endurance by comparing a result from thescratch generated on the surface of the optical disc with apredetermined reference value.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein theload applied on the optical disc by the abrasion wheels during thegeneration of the scratch ranged from 0.5N (50 gf) to 16.2N (1650 gf).10. The method of claim 8, wherein the determining step is proceededafter steps of departing the abrasion wheels contacted on the surface ofthe optical disc from the optical disc, and separating the optical discfrom the rotating plate.
 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the abrasionwheel is any one of CS-10F, CS-10, and CS-17.
 12. The method of claim 8,wherein the scratch is generated when the rotated optical disc isapplied with a load of 0.5N to 2.5N (50 gf to 250 gf) by the CS-10Fabrasion wheel.
 13. The method of claim 8, wherein the scratch isgenerated when the rotated optical disc is applied with a load of 6.4Nto 8.3N (650 gf to 850 gf) by the CS-10 abrasion wheel.
 14. The methodof claim 8, wherein the scratch is generated when the rotated opticaldisc is applied with a load of 11.8N to 13.7N (1200 gf to 1400 gf by theCS-17 abrasion wheel.
 15. The method of claim 8, wherein the determiningstep determines that the optical disc has a sufficient endurance when adepth of the scratch generated on the surface of the optical disc isequal to or greater than 0 μm or less than 2 μm, and that the opticaldisc does not have the sufficient endurance when the depth of thescratch generated on the surface of the optical disc is greater than 2μm.
 16. The method of claim 8, wherein the predetermined reference valuefor determining whether or not the optical disc has a sufficientendurance is 2 μm.
 17. The method of claim 8, wherein the predeterminedtype of the abrasion wheels is CS-10F, and the predetermined load is2.5N.
 18. A method of testing a scratch endurance of a surface of anoptical disc, comprising the steps of: contacting a plurality ofabrasion wheels with a predetermined load to the surface of the opticaldisc to generate a scratch on the surface of the optical disc; comparinga result from the scratch generated on the surface of the optical discwith a predetermined reference value; and determining whether theoptical disc has a predetermined endurance based on a result of thecomparing step.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the scratch isgenerated by the contact of the surface of the optical disc and theabrasion wheels maintained during the optical disc rotates up to fiveturns.
 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the scratch is generated bythe contact of the surface of the optical disc and the abrasion wheelsmaintained during the optical disc rotates one turn to five turns. 21.The method of claim 18, wherein the plurality of abrasion wheels is two,and each type of abrasion wheels is CS-10F.
 22. The method of claim 20,wherein the predetermined load of each CS-10F abrasion wheel is 2.5N.23. An optical disc, the optical disc being the same kind as the opticaldisc determined by the process of at least one of the previous claims.24. An information recording medium having an entrance surface, whichhas a sufficient resistance or not with respect to a scratch, theinformation recording medium can be verified by a test to determinewhether the surface of the information recording medium has a sufficientresistance, wherein the test including the steps of contacting aplurality of abrasion wheels with a predetermined load to the surface ofthe information recording medium to generate a scratch on the surface ofthe information recording medium, comparing a result from the scratchgenerated on the surface of the information recording medium with apredetermined reference value, and determining whether the informationrecording medium has a predetermined endurance based on a result of thecomparing step.
 25. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the predeterminedtype of the abrasion wheels is CS-10F, and the predetermined load is2.5N.